This tournament was run with the classic Traveller Book 5 High Guard and Adventure 5 Trillion Credit Squadron. Six players entered “squadrons” costing no more than one billion credits. Three entries consisted of a single frigate. One entry consisted of a pair of frigates. One entry consisted of four smaller ships. One entry consisted of an armed carrier with four fighters.
Analysis of the top 3 Designs
Each of the three winning ships won all of their games except one. The Dagger lost to the Sloepigg, the Sloepigg lost to the Aristinas, and the Aristinas lost to the Dagger. So, the tournament yielded an unexpected paper-rock-scissors scenario with a three-way tie for first place! Let’s look at the designs to see if it was just luck or if there’s more to it than that.
The Dagger has fair agility, a solid missile battery punch, weak armor, and pretty good defenses. The Sloepigg has poor agility, a solid missile battery punch, incredibly strong armor, and no defenses. The pair of Aristinas have excellent agility, a pair of light batteries, okay armor, and light defenses. All of these ships prefer long range, so we don’t have to worry as much about initiative, range, and so forth. These are all straight up slugging matches that have little need for tactical decisions.
The Dagger hits the Sloepigg on 5+ [Base 2+, DM +0 for computer, DM -2 for agility, DM -1 for size]. However, the Sloepigg’s armor means that the Surface Explosion hits have a DM of +12 on the Damage table– just Fuel-1 and Weapon-1 results there and rolls of 10 or more result in No Effect. The Sloepigg’s Radiation Damage rolls get a DM shift of +17… which is a Weapon-1 hit only if the roll is a 4 or less! The Dagger requires 9 consecutive hits in order to wear down the Sloepigg’s combat capability.
The Dagger and the Sloeppigg both hit the Aristinas on 8+ [Base 2+, DM +0 for computer, DM -5 for agility, DM -1 for size]. The Aristina’s sandcasters are useless against this unless they can wear down those Missile-9’s. The missile-9 is sure to cause a critical hit as well. In the actual game, the Sloepigg hit on the first turn and only managed to disable the Jump drive and score a Weapon-1 and a Fuel-1 hit. It could have gone much worse!
The Sloepigg hits the Dagger on 6+ [Base 2+, DM +0 for computer, DM -3 for agility, DM -1 for size]. When he does hit, he has many opportunities to score Computer and Maneuver hits… making the Dagger even easier to hit on future turns. Once the Sloepigg starts hitting, he will tend to keep hitting.
The Aristinas hit the Sloepigg on 8+ [Base 5+, DM +0 for computer, DM -2 for agility, DM -1 for size]. These are pretty good rolls– and they get four of these chances every turn if they can hang on. The Sloepigg lacks any secondary armament, so all weapon hits will be applied directly to the missile-9 battery.
The Aristinas hit the Dagger on 9+ [Base 5+, DM +0 for computer, DM -3 for agility, DM -1 for size]. Even before being damaged, the Aristinas will be doing good to get one or two hits each turn, but they still have to get through the defenses. The first hit will have to roll 6+ to get past the sandcaster… and all hits have to roll 8+ to get past the nuclear dampers. These aren’t good odds– especially if the Aristinas score only one hit on a turn– so the Dagger has plenty of time to degrade the Aristina’s fighting capabilities without taking any serious damage.
The Dagger’s sandcaster and nuclear damper are going to be pretty useless against the Sloepigg’s ferocious Missile-9. However, they turn out to be fairly effective against the hits caused by the Aristina’s Missile-3’s. The Dagger’s lack of armor makes it extremely vulnerable to Computer and M-Drive hits from the Sloepigg. But the Sloepigg’s lack of defenses make it vulnerable to being slowly worn down by Weapon-1 hits from the Aristinas!
So yes, the results do make sense. No amount of “fog of war”, limited tactical intelligence, or role-playing would affect High Guard games played between these three sets of designs. The players won at the engineering stage and the dice rolling was little more than a formality. That may be a bit dull for a role-playing scenario, but it does make it easy to run a game quickly and fairly in an extended campaign or play-by-email environment. Games will, however, have an exponentially greater number of tactical decisions if they feature multiple ships on each side, ships that have more than one active defense that get hit by a variety of weapon types in a single turn, and ships that have a mix of short and long range weapons.
*** Ship: Dagger V3 Class: Dagger V3 Type: Frigate Architect: Ron Gianti Tech Level: 12 USP FE-A333562-140100-00009-0 MCr 993.611 1.1 KTons Bat Bear 1 1 Crew: 27 Bat 1 1 TL: 12 Cargo: 0.000 Fuel: 385.000 EP: 55.000 Agility: 3 Shipboard Security Detail: 1 Craft: 1 x 20T TL12 Lifeboat 30 person Fuel Treatment: Fuel Scoops and On Board Fuel Purification Architects Fee: MCr 9.841 Cost in Quantity: MCr 796.798 *** Ship: Sloepigg Class: Sloepigg Type: Armored Frigate Architect: OIT Tech Level: 12 USP FA-A433362-B00000-00009-0 MCr 974.113 1000Tons Bat Bear 1 Crew: 23 Bat 1 TL: 12 Cargo: 5.000 Fuel: 330.000 EP: 30.000 Agility: 2 Marines: 10 Craft: 1 x 30T Ship's Boat Fuel Treatment: Fuel Scoops and On Board Fuel Purification Architects Fee: MCr 9.541 Cost in Quantity: MCr 783.291 *** 2 x Aristina Frigate Class Frigates Ship: Aristina Class: Aristina Frigate Type: Frigate Architect: Skyth USP FF-5435662-640000-00003-0 MCr 548.782 500 Tons Bat Bear 1 2 Crew: 12 Bat 1 2 TL: 12 Cargo: 8.000 Fuel: 180.000 EP: 30.000 Agility: 5 Fuel Treatment: Fuel Scoops and On Board Fuel Purification Architects Fee: MCr 5.488 Cost in Quantity: MCr 439.026 ***
Notes on Running the Games
The following tricks will help the High Guard referee maintain his sanity:
1) Make your own reference cards/sheets for each game showing the basic to-hit and penetration for each main combination of ships.
2) Make your own referee reference screen with the charts and tables from pages 45 to 49.
3) Send out sit-rep emails (bcc’d of course) with the exact same text to both players– with blanks where ever a player is required to specify something. The subject line of the email should be in the format of “Event Name, Game #, Turn #”. Gmail threads things such that it is easy to tell at a glance when you’ve received responses from both players.
4) Optionally, keep a template for each game. Get a list of die rolls and just go through and fill in the blanks of your template. Resolve defense rolls all at once… and then damage rolls all together. Alternately, write a program to do this.
5) Players need to have standard operating procedures that specify range (long or short), missile types (nukes or high explosive), and weapon-hit prioritization. If those things are clear, the only thing that’s tricky is weird combinations of hits and defenses… though weird orders of “target such and such if such and such otherwise such and such” can get very difficult to keep track of.
5 Rules to Remember
1) There does not appear to be clear rules on tactical intelligence in High Guard. In TCS tournaments, stats are public once combat is engaged. In role playing scenarios, Leroy Gautney (in a JTAS article) suggested players discover things in the process of battle, but admitted that players would know most of a ship’s specifications in a couple of turns.
2) Weapon damage: the rules for this are actually laid out in the entry on screens on page 49. “Damage must be divided as evenly as possible: no screen may receive two hits until all other screens have a t least one, or three hits until all others have at least two.”
3) Don’t forget the DM’s for relative computer size on the penetration rolls!
4) Don’t forget the automatic criticals when a large weapon hits a small ship.
5) The hardest rule to apply in a PBEM game is the sequence of play of alternating ships for targeting starting with the player that has initiative. Basically, there’s a slight advantage in getting shot at first: you know exactly what’s hitting you before you fire so you can specify your defenses without worrying about wasting laser shots when you go on the offensive. These benefits tend to wash out in larger fleets, I suppose, but it can be a significant nuance in one-on-one battles.
