Recent Comments
Join 485 other subscribers
Recent Posts
- Braunstein Play is Fundamental to D&D
- Is AD&D missing part of the charge rule?
- Is AD&D Missing a Crucial Combat Rule?
- Straight Answers to Honest Questions: The Big One
- Straight Answers to Honest Questions: Braunstein Edition
- Straight Answers to Honest Questions: Obscure AD&D Rules Edition
- Straight Answers to Honest Questions: #BrOSR Edition
- Trollopulous Adjusted Session 48: The Charge of the Douche Brigade
- Trollopulous Adjusted Session 31: The Dragons of Belboz
- Trollopulous Adjusted Sessions 28 & 30: In Which “Always On” Play Creates Massive Amounts of Engagement
BrOSR
- BDubs and Dragons
- Brain Leakage
- BrOSR Aegyptus
- Castleport Sessions
- Chanticleer's Waterdeep Campaign
- Jon Mollison
- Joy of Wargaming Chainmail Playlist
- Mentlegen and Wagons
- Purple Druid's Chainmail Videos
- Stephen's Hobby Workshop
- The Falkirk Sessions
- The Holgard Campaign
- The Red Frontier
- Wampus Country
- You Can Win At Rpgs Playlist
“awesome Jeffro Johnson blog post that I completely forgot I wrote”
I loved your Vikings and Stranger Things live bloggings.
Those happened in 2016
https://plus.google.com/106512618424209956610/posts/Jm36DLsXkKZ
Jeffro, where do you keep finding these awesome covers of the pulp era? Is there a photo file collection on the web somewhere that you recommend?
A google image search of Appendix N authors’ names reliably turns up some great covers. This one… with a Moore Merritt stories to boot is in a class of its own, however. Everything that’s been bled out of sff in one image, wow! Avon: the name you trust for the truly good stuff! Bwa-ha-ha!
Frazetta, Brundage, and Finlay form the trinity of pulp cover greatness, no doubt. They’re the ones I sent to the cover artist to use as a reference when I had the cover for my book put together. And yeah… the guy totally “got” it.
Yes, your artist did a great job with that and did a decent job with that cover he did for John C. Wright.
Thanks. What I find interesting about the covers is on the issue of feminine aesthetics that gets discussed at times in this sphere and definitely within the what is now being called the alt-right but used to be largely referred to as the manosphere. Rubenesque women are definitely not on the covers, nor are Twiggy Lawsonesque women. While a fun art source, they also serve as more evidence of what a male audience actually likes visually in women, among other evidence. I’ll go a searching, thanks for the tips.
Also the wife likes the covers of these pulps. She wanted me to look up the legal status of the artwork to know what the deal would be for reprints for wall art would be.
Also, is it just me, or do the same 15 or so illustrated women keep gracing the pulp covers? I figure the artists had a particular model, be it an ideal in their head, their wife, or an actual model they work with. There just seems to be a slight consistency in their look, kinda like Greek statues but not as completely uniform.
Pingback: Appendix N and the Dawn of the Pulp Revolution – castaliahouse.com