Recent Comments
Join 486 other subscribers
Recent Posts
- GURPS Fantasy First Edition Session One
- Braunstein Play is Fundamental to D&D
- Is AD&D missing part of the charge rule?
- Is AD&D Missing a Crucial Combat Rule?
- Straight Answers to Honest Questions: The Big One
- Straight Answers to Honest Questions: Braunstein Edition
- Straight Answers to Honest Questions: Obscure AD&D Rules Edition
- Straight Answers to Honest Questions: #BrOSR Edition
- Trollopulous Adjusted Session 48: The Charge of the Douche Brigade
- Trollopulous Adjusted Session 31: The Dragons of Belboz
BrOSR
- BDubs and Dragons
- Brain Leakage
- BrOSR Aegyptus
- Castleport Sessions
- Chanticleer's Waterdeep Campaign
- Jon Mollison
- Joy of Wargaming Chainmail Playlist
- Mentlegen and Wagons
- Purple Druid's Chainmail Videos
- Stephen's Hobby Workshop
- The Falkirk Sessions
- The Holgard Campaign
- The Red Frontier
- Wampus Country
- You Can Win At Rpgs Playlist
You expose pious virtue-signaling very nicely, but I’m sure your insight goes over the heads of—and will be unwelcome by—the self-righteous in Hollywood, academia, and the journalist community.
Having denounced real atonement and insight, post-Christian writers and directors replace it with posturing and finger pointing, i.e., in blaming others they misdirect themselves as well as the others. Having rediscovering the Christian ethics they mocked, they appropriate them and declare themselves brilliant and sensitive. On the doorstep of actually understanding they fear to step inside.
I had fun with this theme in my fiction story, “Time Cube.” https://wordpress.com/post/keithkennyblog.wordpress.com/709
It’s been a long time since I saw Flatliners, but I liked it. I liked the fact that the protagonists are forced to deal with their pasts, and in some cases are responsible for hurting people and must face up to it. And yes, even atone, if only symbolically. Even self-centered science nerds.
As a teenager, the message I got from it was: your actions have consequences; consequences can’t be undone; and the root sin still must be dealt with in the end. Because why? Because:
“And just as people are appointed to die once, and then to face judgment, so also, after Christ was offered once to bear the sins of many, to those who eagerly await him he will appear a second time, not to bear sin but to bring salvation.” [Heb 9.27]
Of course, the movie didn’t supply the Hope that passage provides. But that’s the answer to the movie’s question.
Notice also that the women the one guy sleeps with are not complicit in engaging in the sin of fornication. It is the “tricking” of the women into sleeping with him that is the sin there– as if the women were all genuinely attempting to sex their way into a permanent commitment.
The idea here is that women are above sin and have nothing to repent of even as they embrace a life of outright hedonism and debauchery– as if they have no agency or responsibility at all!